[18 ] Female War Lousy Deal
Download Woman female war lousy deal Subtitles (subs - srt files) in all available video formats. Subtitles for Woman female war lousy deal found in search results bellow can have various languages and frame rate result. For more precise subtitle search please enter additional info in search field (language, frame rate, movie year, tv show episode number).
[18 ] Female War Lousy Deal
Master class of squirt in an auditorium in front of more than 200 people Pamela Sánchez shows the public how to get an orgasm with squirting and female ejaculation. The public was fascinated by this explicit sex education lesson.
Needless to say, the screeners cleared Eland, but he did not return the favor: even a casual inspection of TSA procedures shows they are a lousy way to enhance airline security, according to Eland. Those methods target the modus operandi of previous terrorist attempts (as if potential attackers wouldn’t adapt to new security measures), they inconvenience and humiliate ordinary travelers, and they violate the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches. Vigilant airline passengers provide better security than do overbearing government bureaucracies, Eland concludes.
President Bush Discusses War on Terror, Economy with Associated General Contractors of AmericaWillard HotelWashington, D.C. Play Video Presidential Remarks Audio 9:44 A.M. EDTTHE PRESIDENT:Thank you all; please be seated. Steve, unlike you, Ihave trouble finding the front end of a front-end loader. (Laughter.)Thanks for having me. I'm proud to be here with the AGC. It's theoldest and largest construction trade association in our country. Iunderstand I'm not the first Bush to have ever addressed the AGCconvention -- a person I now refer to as "41" addressed you.(Laughter.) And I appreciated your hospitality to him then, and Iappreciate your hospitality to me today.I want to talk about -- a little bit about our economy and I want totalk a lot about our security.And I thank you for giving me a chanceto come by. What I thought I would do is try to keep my remarksrelatively brief and then maybe give you all some time to ask somequestions.First, I want to thank Steve. Steve is a Virginia Tech grad, and ourhearts are still heavy as a result of that terrible incident there onthe campus. And, yet, the amazing thing about that campus -- and a lotof other places around the country -- is we've got a great resiliency;people bounce back from tragedy. So, Steve, you can tell the VirginiaTech community we're still thinking about them and appreciate very muchthe great kind of strength of spirit there -- at least I saw that therein Blacksburg, Virginia.I want to thank two members of the Senate who have joined us. First,John Warner, from Virginia. Senator, thank you for coming; rankingmember of the House Military Committee -- Armed Services Committee --he's a strong supporter of the troops.And I appreciate Senator JoeLieberman. John is a Republican, Senator Lieberman is an independent.Joe Lieberman is one of these -- I would call him a unique soul whofollowed his conscience, stood for what he believed in, in the face of apolitical firestorm. And he proved that if you stand on conviction, thepeople will follow. And I look forward to working with these two reallyfine public servants to make the decisions necessary to protect theUnited States.And I'm honored you all are here and thank you forcoming. (Applause.)I like to be in the room of builders and doers and problem solvers andentrepreneurs.And I thank you for what you do every day. Your job isto improve infrastructure and provide work for people.Our job is toprovide an environment so that you can build infrastructure and providework for people. Our job is not to try to create wealth in government.Our job is to create an environment that encourages small businesses andentrepreneurial -- and entrepreneurs.I believe this administration has done that, particularly since we cuttaxes.You know, most small businesses and self-employed people, peoplein your line of work, or many of them, are not corporations. They'vesole proprietorships, or subchapter S corporations, or limitedpartnerships that pay tax at the individual income tax level.And, therefore, when you cut taxes, we not only -- individual rates,we're not only cutting them on the people who work for you or work withyou, we're cutting them on you. And my attitude is the more money youhave in your treasuries, the more likely it is you'll be able to expand.The more incentive you have to buy a piece of equipment, the more likelyit is you'll buy one, which means that somebody is going to have tobuild it for you.The best way to enhance pro-growth economic policies is to cut the taxeson the American people. And that's exactly what we did. These taxesare set to expire. In my judgment, if Congress really wants to create apro-growth attitude for a long time coming, they ought to make the taxrelief we passed permanent. They ought not to let them expire.(Applause.)My attitude is this about the budget: The best way to balance thebudget is to keep taxes low, encourage growth, which enhances taxrevenues, and be wise about how we spend money. I worry about theattitude, don't worry, we're just going to raise the taxes on some tobalance the budget. No, they'll raise the tax on some and figure outnew ways to spend the money.And we're proving that pro-growth economic policies with fiscaldiscipline can work. And our budgets are shrinking [sic]. The best way tokeep them shrinking is keep the economy growing and be wise about -- andsetting priorities with your money.There's other things we can do in Washington. We've got to make surehealth care is affordable and available, without inviting the federalgovernment to run the health care system. Got to do something aboutthese junk lawsuits that I'm sure you're concerned about. We've got tocontinue to invest in the nation's infrastructure. We also need animmigration system that upholds the rule of law and treats people withrespect. We need an immigration system that secures our borders andmeets the needs of our economy. As I said in the speech down in Floridathe other day, we need an immigration system without amnesty and withoutanimosity. In other words, we need a comprehensive immigration reform.I want to thank you for the stand you have taken in working withCongress on comprehensive immigration reform. I join you. I will workwith both Republicans and Democrats to get a bill to my desk before thesummer is out, hopefully. And I thank the leadership in the Senatethat's working through this issue. I want to thank Senator Jon Kyl ofArizona for working hard on this, Mel Martinez, Arlen Specter, LindseyGraham. There's a series of senators who are working with Ted Kennedy,who is a strong advocate for comprehensive immigration reform.And Iappreciate the leadership he's taken, along with Ken Salazar ofColorado.We're making progress.There's a lot more work to be done, and yourhelp is important. And so I want to thank you for coming up with arational, reasonable, logical plan.I want to talk to you about the other main issue we have here inAmerica, and that is your security. The most important job we have isto secure the United States of America. That's the most important jobof the federal government. You expect us to spend enormous amounts ofenergy protecting you, and that's what we're doing. I vowed to theAmerican people we would not tire when it came to protecting you, andwe're not going to. Matter of fact, I spend a lot of time thinkingabout this issue. I wish I didn't have to spend time thinking about theissue, but I do, because there's still an enemy out there that wouldlike to do America harm. And, therefore, at this hour, we've got menand women in uniform engaging our enemies around the world. Ourstrategy is, we've got to keep the pressure on them. We would ratherfight them there, so we don't have to face them here. (Applause.)And the most visible and violent front of this global war is Iraq. Andit's a tough fight. It has been a difficult year for the Americanpeople, I understand that. It reached -- last year was, this battlereached its most difficult point to date. The terrorists and extremistsand radicals set off a wave of sectarian violence that engulfed thatyoung democracy's capital. It threatened to destabilize the entirecountry.So earlier this year I laid out a new strategy in Iraq. I named a newcommander to carry it out, General David Petraeus. I want to give yousome facts about the new strategy, and talk about why Iraq relatesdirectly to the safety of the American people.The most important fact about our new strategy, it is fundamentallydifferent from the previous strategy. The previous strategy wasn'tworking the way we wanted it to work. It's interesting, they run polls-- and I accept that -- and it said, you know, we don't approve ofwhat's happening in Iraq. That was what the poll said last fall andwinter, you know. And had they polled me, I'd have said the same thing.(Laughter.) I didn't approve of what was happening in Iraq. And so weput a new strategy in that was fundamentally different.First of all, Petraeus, General Petraeus is an expert oncounterinsurgency, and his top priority is to help the Iraqi leaders --who, by the way, were elected by nearly 12 million of their citizens --secure their population. And the reason why is, is that this youngdemocracy needed some time to make important political decisions to helpreconcile the country.After a thorough review, we concluded the bestway to help Iraq's leaders to provide security was to send more troopsinto the nation's capital, into the country; was to send reinforcementsto those troops which were already there. And their job was to go afterthe extremists and radicals who were inciting sectarian violence. Theirjob was to help get Baghdad under control. And their job was tocontinue to train Iraqi forces for the day they can secure the countryon their own.Last week, General Petraeus came to Washington, and he updated me and heupdated the Congress on the early stages of this new strategy -- and Irepeat, early stages. He reminded us that not all the reinforcementshe'd requested have arrived, that it's going to be at least until theend of this summer that he will know whether or not the new strategy hasachieved successes.And that means the strategy is in early stages. My view is the Congressand the country ought to give General Petraeus time to see whether ornot this works. And it's interesting, he goes up in front of the Senateand gets confirmed unanimously. And he said, I need more troops, duringhis testimony; send me more troops and I will go implement a new plan.They said, okay, fine, we confirm you.And yet there are some doubts inWashington whether or not they ought to send the troops.The troops are going, the strategy is new, and the General said, let'sgive it some time to work to see whether or not it's successful, andI'll be able to report back to the country by the end of this summer.The most significant element of the new strategy is being carried out inthe capital. The whole purpose is to secure the capital. My theory is,and it's a good one, is that if the capital is in chaos, the countrycan't -- it's going to be difficult for the country to survive.The strategy is also being carried out in what's called surroundingbelts.This is the areas that kind of arc around the capital, and it'sa place where there's been a lot of planning and plotting and attacking.Three American brigades, totaling about 12,000 reinforcements, havetaken up their positions in the Baghdad area. The fourth brigade,fourth of five, is heading into Baghdad this week. And the fifth is onits way. In other words, you just don't take five brigades and movethem in overnight. There's a sequencing that has to take place, andthat sequencing is now being completed.The Iraqis, by the way, have increased their own forces. In otherwords, this is a joint operation. This is the Americans and coalitionforces helping the Iraqis provide security so that the average personcan live a peaceful life. That's what they want. And so we've gotabout a total of 80,000 combat forces now in the Baghdad area -- U.S.,combined with the Iraqi forces. The position of the forces is shifting.We used to have our forces live in bases outside the city. They wouldgo in at night or during the day and then leave and go back home atnight.They did a fine job, as we expect our U.S. forces to do, theIraqi forces would do so. And then when they would leave, killers wouldmove back in.And so now we've got American troops are now living and working in smallneighborhood posts called joint security stations. This is what'sfundamentally different from the strategy. Our troops, with the Iraqis,go into a neighborhood, and they stay.They operate side by side withthe Iraqi forces.What's interesting is, is that the plan, General Petraeus's plan, is tohelp build trust. And when you build trust, you end up getting peoplebuying into a centralized government, a unity government, a country thatis united. And not only that, you end up getting cooperation frompeople. Remember, most people want to live peaceful lives. I hope thismake sense to you, because I firmly believe that Iraqi moms want theirchild to grow up in a peaceful world, just like American moms do.And so we're seeing some gains. The interesting thing about this isthat the nature of this strategy is that the most important gains areoften the least dramatic. It doesn't generate much attention whenviolence does not happen. Instead, some important indicators ofprogress in the security plan are less visible. I would like to sharesome with you.The level of cooperation from local residents is important. It's anindication as to whether or not we're making progress: our ability totake weapons off the street and break up extremist groups; thewillingness of Iraqis to join their security forces is an interestingmeasurement. And, finally, it's important to measure the level ofsectarian violence. If the objective is to bring security to thecapital, one measurement is whether or not sectarian violence isdeclining. These measures are really not flashy. In other words,they're not headline-grabbing measures. They certainly can't competewith a car bomb or a suicide attack. But they are interestingindications. And as General Petraeus reported, these are heading in theright direction.For example, General Petraeus reports that American and Iraqi forcesreceived more tips from local residents in the past four months thanduring any other four-month period on record. People are beginning tohave some confidence and they're beginning to step forth withinformation, information that will help them live normal lives.Thanks to these tips the number of weapons caches that are being seizedare growing each month. Better intelligence has led American and Iraqiforces in Baghdad and the surrounding belts to conduct operationsagainst Sunni and Shia extremists. My attitude is, if murderers runfree, it's going to be hard to convince the people of any society thatthe government is worth supporting. And, therefore, the Iraqis and U.S.forces and coalition forces are after murderers regardless of theirreligious affiliation.American and Iraqi forces captured the head of a major car bombing ringrecently, the leader of a bombing network with ties to Iran, members ofa death squad that terrorized a Baghdad neighborhood, the leader of asecret militia cell that kidnapped and executed American soldiers.These are just some examples of what happens when you start to earn theconfidence of the people.Baghdad residents see actions, they grow more confident. Interestinglyenough, General Petraeus reported that in his short time he's beenthere, and in the short time that this plan is being implemented --remember, it's not fully implemented: three of the brigades arepresent, are in place; the fourth brigade has just moved into Baghdadand it will be in place relatively soon, and the fifth is on its way --that in spite of the fact that we haven't fully implemented the plan,the number of sectarian murders in Baghdad has dropped substantially.Even as the sectarian attacks have declined, the overall level ofviolence in Baghdad remains high. Illegal armed groups continue theirattacks; insurgents remain deadly. In other words, as we reportprogress, it's very important for us to make sure that the Americanpeople understand there's still issues, there's still challenges.Illegal armed groups need to be dealt with, and we are.The primary reason for the high level of violence is this: al Qaeda hasratcheted up its campaign of high-profile attacks, including deadlysuicide bombers carried out by foreign terrorists. In the past threeweeks, al Qaeda has sent suicide bombers into the Iraqi parliament. Orthey send a suicide attack into an American military base. Theseattacks may seem like random killing; they're not. They're part of alQaeda's calculated campaign to reignite sectarian violence in Baghdad,to discourage the Iraqi citizen, and to break support for the war hereat home. This is what these murderers are trying to achieve.I don't need to remind you who al Qaeda is. Al Qaeda is the group thatplot and planned and trained killers to come and kill people on oursoil. The same bunch that is causing havoc in Iraq were the ones whocame and murdered our citizens. I've got to tell you, that day deeplyaffected my decision-making. And I vowed that I would do anything thatI possibly could within the law to protect the American citizens againstfurther attack by these ideologues, by these murderers.And so while I'm talking about al Qaeda in Iraq, I fully recognize whathappens in Iraq matters here at home. Despite their tremendousbrutality, they failed to provoke the large-scale sectarian reprisalsthat al Qaeda wants. The recent attacks are not the revenge killingsthat some have called a civil war. They are a systematic assault on theentire nation.Al Qaeda is public enemy number one in Iraq. And allpeople of that society ought to come together and recognize the threat,unite against the threat and reconcile their differences.For America, the decision we face in Iraq is not whether we ought totake sides in a civil war, it's whether we stay in the fight against thesame international terrorist network that attacked us on 9/11.Istrongly believe it's in our national interest to stay in the fight.(Applause.)As you watch the developments in Baghdad, it's important to understandthat we will not be able to prevent every al Qaeda attack. When aterrorist is willing to kill himself to kill others, it's really hard tostop him. Yet, over time, the security operation in Baghdad is designedto shrink the areas where al Qaeda can operate, it's designed to bringout more intelligence about their presence, and designed to allowAmerican and Iraqi forces to dismantle their network.We have a strategy to deal with al Qaeda in Iraq. But any time you sayto a bunch of cold-blooded killers, success depends on no violence, allthat does is hand them the opportunity to be successful. And it's hard.I know it's hard for the American people to turn on their TV screens andsee the horrific violence. It speaks volumes about the American desireto protect lives of innocent people, America's deep concern about humanrights and human dignity. It also speaks volumes about al Qaeda, thatthey're willing to take innocent life to achieve political objectives.The terrorists will continue to fight back. In other words, theyunderstand what they're doing.And casualties are likely to stay high.Yet, day by day, block by block, we are steadfast in helping Iraqileaders counter the terrorists, protect their people, and reclaim thecapital. And if I didn't think it was necessary for the security of thecountry, I wouldn't put our kids in harm's way.We're seei